See behavior, not just signatures
Identify deviations in user, device, and workload activity that may indicate compromised credentials, misuse, reconnaissance, or preparation for destructive action.
Pulse learns what normal looks like across your Microsoft environment, identifies meaningful deviations, and accelerates containment—helping your team reduce attacker dwell time, ransomware exposure, and manual response pressure.
Pulse connects behavior-based detection, business-aware prioritization, and response actions in one workflow, so security and IT teams can act on the right risk with the right context.
A cyberattack rarely begins with an obvious alarm. It begins with a small deviation: a user signing in from an unusual location, an endpoint starting a process it has never used before, a workload communicating with an unexpected destination, or an identity requesting access outside its normal pattern. Individually, these events can look harmless. Together, and in the right context, they can signal the early stages of credential abuse, lateral movement, data theft, or ransomware.
The challenge is not simply collecting more alerts. Most security and IT teams already receive more signals than they can investigate properly. The real challenge is identifying which change in behavior represents credible business risk, understanding what is affected, and deciding what to do before the situation escalates. Every manual handoff, disconnected dashboard, and missing piece of context adds delay. During an active attack, that delay gives an adversary more time to move, gain privileges, disable safeguards, or reach critical systems.
Pulse is designed to shorten that distance between signal and action. It establishes a view of normal behavior across users, endpoints, and workloads, then looks for meaningful deviations. Rather than treating every technical event as equally urgent, Pulse helps place suspicious activity in context. Is the identity privileged? Is the device connected to a critical business process? Does the sequence resemble preparation for encryption or lateral movement? Has the same behavior appeared elsewhere in the environment?
This context helps responders focus on the activity most likely to create operational impact. It also gives security and IT teams a shared picture of the incident, reducing the time lost to separate investigations and uncertainty about ownership.
Once a threat is considered credible, speed must remain balanced with control. An automatic response without context can interrupt legitimate work, while a slow approval chain can allow an attack to spread. Pulse supports a policy-driven approach in which isolation, connection blocking, rollback, and recovery actions can be aligned with the organization’s own risk tolerance, processes, and responsibilities.
The objective is not automation for its own sake. The objective is to make the right action available at the moment it can still limit damage. That can mean isolating a compromised endpoint before ransomware reaches shared resources, blocking a suspicious connection before data leaves the environment, or preserving the evidence needed to understand what happened and demonstrate how the organization responded.
The result is a more controlled security operation: earlier recognition of meaningful anomalies, clearer prioritization, faster containment, and a stronger route back to normal operations. Pulse connects detection, decision, response, and recovery as one continuous workflow. This helps reduce attacker dwell time, protects business continuity, and gives leadership greater confidence that security controls do more than generate alerts—they support decisive action when the organization needs it most.
Establish normal user, endpoint, and workload behavior, then surface meaningful deviations.
Recognize suspicious patterns before encryption or lateral movement can spread.
Focus responders on credible business risk instead of another queue of undifferentiated alerts.
Accelerate device isolation, connection blocking, and rollback actions with clear context.
Preserve evidence and return operations to a known, controlled state faster.
Pulse uses your existing Microsoft environment as its operational foundation, avoiding unnecessary endpoint weight while giving teams a faster, more coherent route from signal to response.

A suspicious sign-in, abnormal process, or unexpected connection can be the first signal of a larger attack. Yet responders often lose valuable time collecting context from separate tools, deciding whether a signal is credible, finding the right owner, and carrying out containment manually.
Pulse is designed to reduce that delay. It combines behavioral insight with risk context and response support, helping teams intervene while an incident is still containable. That matters especially during ransomware and lateral-movement scenarios, where minutes can determine whether the impact remains local or becomes organization-wide.
Identify deviations in user, device, and workload activity that may indicate compromised credentials, misuse, reconnaissance, or preparation for destructive action.
Understand whether an alert affects a privileged identity, critical endpoint, sensitive workload, or high-impact business process before deciding how to respond.
Support rapid isolation, connection blocking, rollback, and evidence preservation so a credible threat does not remain active while teams coordinate manually.
Effective response requires security and IT to work from the same facts. Pulse helps both teams understand what happened, why it matters, which assets are involved, and which action is appropriate.
Security teams gain behavioral context and clearer prioritization. IT teams gain a more practical route to containment and recovery within the Microsoft environment they already manage. This shared operating picture reduces handoffs, duplicate investigation, and uncertainty about ownership.
Pulse does not assume your organization is starting from zero. It is intended to complement the Microsoft controls, security processes, and expertise you already have.
Begin with a targeted deployment around the assets or scenarios that matter most. Validate detection quality, response workflow, and operational value. Then expand coverage based on evidence instead of committing to unnecessary complexity upfront.
A useful demo should be about your operating reality, not a generic product tour. We use your priorities to determine which scenarios, integrations, and outcomes deserve attention.
Your Microsoft foundation, endpoint landscape, identities, critical workloads, and current security tooling.
The ransomware, credential misuse, insider, and lateral-movement risks that concern you most.
How alerts are investigated, approved, contained, escalated, and documented today.
The reduction in risk, response time, manual work, or uncertainty that would create value.
Reduce the likelihood that a cyber incident becomes an operational crisis, while giving security and IT teams more capacity to improve instead of constantly firefighting.
Contain suspicious activity sooner, before it escalates into costly downtime and missed commitments.
Keep incidents smaller, preserve better evidence, and make response easier to explain to customers and leaders.
Reduce repetitive triage and manual response pressure with clearer priorities and accelerated action.